Loading Rate: Part 1: What does it mean for you?

I was at a conference recently where someone asked me –  “With all the fancy equipment and data you’ve got access to, what it the biggest thing you’ve noticed and how has it made you change your personal running style?”

Easy! I’ve learned through the years, that it’s critical to minimize loading rate. Loading rate is the speed at which you apply forces to the body. While running, you aren’t going to change your body mass during a run  (OK –I know you do slightly due to hydration issues, by let’s ignore this for a moment). Your total mass stays relatively the same. However, how you move your body’s mass forward when running does play a major role in the way your body is affected by the forces we see in running.

In the lab, loading rate can be objectively measured. Some labs use accelerometers to determine peak values and rates, some use the slope of the ground reaction force. Both have been investigated as viable ways to assess loading rate. We’ll use slope of the ground reaction force (GRF) since it’s a bit more visual to help get the concept across. If you look at the graphs, you’ll see that the one graph has a steeper slope to it than the other. The steeper slope (top graph) means that the forces applied to the runner occur quicker than that of the forces applied to the less steep slope (bottom). Why does this matter?

Imagine running 50 miles a week. Think of the amount of wear and tear that occurs on the body. Now imagine running 50 miles a week with a gait pattern that causes the mechanical loading of the body to occur less quickly. Decreasing the loading rate applied to tissues will minimize tissue stress to the runner, minimizing the effects of the micro-trauma of endurance training. The rate at which structures are loaded has been implicated in both stress fractures and soft tissue dysfunction (1, 2)

Now  – full disclaimer here, there is some discrepancy in the literature on whether or not the “impact peak” actually causes injury. This post is not going to debate the presence of the impact peak itself, only the difference between running with a high loading rate (not good) or a lower loading rate (better). Should everyone go lower and lower? There is a point at which the metabolic cost of lowering the rate of loading to the tissues is more expensive from a metabolic standpoint. Further, there is likely a lower limit to what one’s loading rate can be. These are questions that need to be answered individually with a lab analysis, as it is speed and mass dependent and not one-size-fits-all.

There are 3 primary ways you can affect the rate at which you load the body:

1.Contact pattern
2.Postural alignment
3. Limb stiffness

Tomorrow we’ll discuss how these 3 factors impact the loading rate of a runner….including directly addressing a lot of the hype around fore/mid/rear foot contact styles – Stay tuned!

References:

1. Milner, C.E., R. Ferber, C.D. Pollard, J. Hamill, and I.S. Davis.  February 2006.  Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc.  38(2):323-8.

2. Milner, C.E., J. Hamil, and I. Davis.  July 2007.  Are knee mechanics during early stance related to tibial stress fracture in runners? Clin Biomech.  22(6):697-703.

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Loading Rate: Part 1: What does it mean for you?

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Loading Rate: Part 1: What does it mean for you? « Uvaendurosport's Blog -- Topsy.com

  2. TriExpert

    Very interested in the follow-on posts! Particularly curious about the difference (or interference) between “stiffness” (a Seemingly Good Thing according to the recent literature) and high loading rate.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Vertical Impact Loading Rate in Running: Post #2 from Jay Dicharry of the UVA Speed Lab | Road Runner Shoes

  4. Todd Baldini

    Jay,

    Do you have horizontal ground reaction force data? I think there would be a more dramatic difference in mid-foot vs. heel strike gait patterns in the horizontal ground reaction force than vertical ground reaction force. There’s definitely a difference in vertical ground reaction forces but I have a hard time believing its that significant. (I’ll admit I haven’t read Milner’s papers you reference). Your thoughts on horizontal ground reaction forces?

    Thanks,
    Todd

    Reply
    1. University of Virginia Center for Endurance Sport Post author

      Todd- you can tweak loading rates a LOT. We do it every day. Peak vertical ground reaction force is harder to tweak. It can be done, but its subtle.
      Horizontal GRF? Yes the peak’s change a lot with different contact styles, but the area under the curve (impulse) should be the same if the runner is holding steady state velocity.

      Reply
  5. Pingback: Vertical Impact Loading Rate in Running: Linkages to Running Injury Risk | Road Runner Shoes

  6. Pingback: Start List/Liste de Départ: Cross Country Season! « Montreal Endurance

  7. Pingback: Coolest Treadmill on the Planet: Just Make Sure to “Run Tall! Run Soft!” « ZERO DROP

  8. Pingback: What is Loading Rate? « Cutting Edge Running

  9. Pingback: Should You Start Barefoot Running? | Barefoot Running 101

  10. Pingback: Should You Start Barefoot Running? | The Fit Stop

  11. Pingback: Loading Rate: Part 1: What does it mean for you? « Uvaendurosport’s Blog | Life In Michigan

  12. Pingback: Running Awareness: Cadence, Foot Placement, Lean | Denver Fitness Journal

  13. Pingback: Achilles Tendonitis Progress | Denver Fitness Journal

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s